<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coffee With A Cause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Dodds</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica Dodds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like number&#039;s 3 and 4. I think you may have to check copyrights on number 4, it looks familar to me. Maybe from Hybrid cars or something, but you may not be able to use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like number&#8217;s 3 and 4. I think you may have to check copyrights on number 4, it looks familar to me. Maybe from Hybrid cars or something, but you may not be able to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother Ammin</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brother Ammin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah says #3.  I like the natural look of #2, the generic look of #3, and the logo branding potential of #4.  Give #4 a shot in brown and see how it looks.  How&#039;s that for being wishy washy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah says #3.  I like the natural look of #2, the generic look of #3, and the logo branding potential of #4.  Give #4 a shot in brown and see how it looks.  How&#8217;s that for being wishy washy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rogers</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^I like what he said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^I like what he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of these three and four would seem the better choices.  Number three actually seems generic enough that you could do almost anything with the coffee shop and not feel betrayed by the logo.  Number four I like in the green because it gives it a lighter and more organic feel that most coffee shop logos don&#039;t have.  Seriously, there is too much reliance on dark browns and greens.  However, to use number four, one is going to have to recreate that organic and lighter feel in the coffee shop.  Successfully pulling that off could be a great setting (better than the traditional, darker, generic kinds of settings most coffee shops provide) for ministry.  Recreating that organic feel would mean seeing as little metal in the room as possible.  There would be light wood grains (maybe some bamboo), light/bright colors, and furniture, fixtures and a layout that gave the feeling of a room in flux.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of these three and four would seem the better choices.  Number three actually seems generic enough that you could do almost anything with the coffee shop and not feel betrayed by the logo.  Number four I like in the green because it gives it a lighter and more organic feel that most coffee shop logos don&#8217;t have.  Seriously, there is too much reliance on dark browns and greens.  However, to use number four, one is going to have to recreate that organic and lighter feel in the coffee shop.  Successfully pulling that off could be a great setting (better than the traditional, darker, generic kinds of settings most coffee shops provide) for ministry.  Recreating that organic feel would mean seeing as little metal in the room as possible.  There would be light wood grains (maybe some bamboo), light/bright colors, and furniture, fixtures and a layout that gave the feeling of a room in flux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rogers</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#4 in brown.  I agree with the logo branding.  The ones with cups, including the new one you just posted separately, are nice but maybe a little bit commonplace?  No one mistakes the word coffee as possibly meaning salad, so you can afford to be unique.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 in brown.  I agree with the logo branding.  The ones with cups, including the new one you just posted separately, are nice but maybe a little bit commonplace?  No one mistakes the word coffee as possibly meaning salad, so you can afford to be unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elisabeth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like number 3 best, but number 4 is my second choice!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like number 3 best, but number 4 is my second choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. D.</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like #3.  But #4 is not far behind and I agree with Jamie in reference to the stand alone logo.  When you see the Starbucks logo it makes you instantly think of Starbucks coffee.  That could definitely work for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #3.  But #4 is not far behind and I agree with Jamie in reference to the stand alone logo.  When you see the Starbucks logo it makes you instantly think of Starbucks coffee.  That could definitely work for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisrhodenhizer</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisrhodenhizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[go with the last one bro]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go with the last one bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason pelt</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason pelt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like #4 but in the brown]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #4 but in the brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aletheiaodu</title>
		<link>http://dirtyclint.com/2009/04/21/1077/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aletheiaodu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintclifton.wordpress.com/?p=1077#comment-521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a marketing stand point I would go with the last one because the logo could stand alone for branding purposes. I would play with the coloring on it though. Just a thought. Love the marketplace ministry concept. Gotta go up and meet with Mark Batterson and his crew if you wanna do it right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a marketing stand point I would go with the last one because the logo could stand alone for branding purposes. I would play with the coloring on it though. Just a thought. Love the marketplace ministry concept. Gotta go up and meet with Mark Batterson and his crew if you wanna do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

